Loading…
DATA STATUS
417 series loaded · last import on 2026-10-25

Forecasts Probabilities, not certainties, and their score on past data

These are not official warnings. These probabilities are computed by the Observatory from the statistical links established on this site, and tested on years the models never saw. For any decision, follow the competent services: NOAA SWPC (space weather), USGS and local authorities (earthquakes), tsunami warning centres.
Issued 2026-10-25 18:46:32 UTC, recomputed every hour Levels: Low < 10 % Moderate 10–30 % High 30–60 % Very high ≥ 60 %

Radiation-belt electrons

Moderate

Will the flux of electrons above 2 MeV at geostationary orbit exceed, on average, the NOAA alert threshold (1,000 pfu) the day after tomorrow?

29%
95 % interval: 25 to 32 %, observed frequency over 579 similar situations
Window: 27/10/2026 to 28/10/2026 (UTC)
Usual probability: 25 % (× 1.2)
  • Solar wind, 24 h mean 357 km/s · slow wind
  • Electrons ≥ 2 MeV, 24 h mean 1,278 pfu · above the alert threshold
Gain over climatology 0.44 · wind speed and persistence; 3,708 days from 2010 to 2020

Geomagnetic storm

Moderate

Will the Kp index reach 5 (G1 storm or more) at least once in the next three UTC days?

24%
95 % interval: 23 to 25 %, observed frequency over 5,514 similar situations
Window: 26/10/2026 to 29/10/2026 (UTC)
Usual probability: 32 % (× 0.7)
  • Highest Kp, last 24 h 1.00
  • Highest Kp one solar rotation earlier 1.67 · no storm 27 days ago
  • Sunspot number, 28-day mean 61 · moderate activity (30/09/2026)
NOAA, minor storm per day (issued 2026 Oct 24 2205 UTC): Oct 25 : 25 %Oct 26 : 5 %Oct 27 : 1 %
Gain over climatology 0.16 · 27-day recurrence, persistence and solar activity; 13,430 situations since 1990

Global temperature of the coming months

What global temperature anomaly (GISTEMP, relative to 1951–1980) for the next three months, and what chance of a record?

Forecast suspended: the model is not computed yet (app:analysis:compute).

Aurora visible from a few cities

Is an aurora visible within the next hour, overhead or above the horizon of the city, and is it dark enough?

NOAA OVATION Prime model, valid around 2026-10-25 18:46:00 UTC.
CityOverheadAbove the horizonSky
Paris < 3 % < 3 % night (Sun at -22°)
Lille < 3 % < 3 % night (Sun at -22°)
Brest < 3 % < 3 % night (Sun at -17°)
Strasbourg < 3 % < 3 % night (Sun at -25°)
Edinburgh < 3 % < 3 % night (Sun at -18°)
Oslo < 3 % 3 % night (Sun at -24°)
Stockholm < 3 % < 3 % night (Sun at -28°)
Helsinki < 3 % 4 % night (Sun at -31°)
Reykjavik < 3 % 6 % too bright (Sun at -9°): invisible
Tromsø 9 % 12 % night (Sun at -24°)
Montreal < 3 % < 3 % too bright (Sun at 25°): invisible
Quebec City < 3 % < 3 % too bright (Sun at 23°): invisible
Anchorage < 3 % < 3 % too bright (Sun at 8°): invisible
Fairbanks < 3 % 5 % too bright (Sun at 6°): invisible
Hobart < 3 % < 3 % too bright (Sun at -3°): invisible
Dunedin < 3 % < 3 % too bright (Sun at 14°): invisible

Aftershocks of recent large earthquakes

For every earthquake of magnitude 6.5 or more in the last 30 days: probability of at least one aftershock of magnitude 5, 6, 7 or more, or of an even larger earthquake, in its zone over the next seven days.

Earthquakes followed and probability of an M ≥ 5 aftershock within 7 days
Probabilities of at least one aftershock in the zone of the earthquake, from 2026-10-25 18:46:32 UTC to 2026-11-01 18:46:32 UTC.
EarthquakeM ≥ 5 aftershocks so far M ≥ 5M ≥ 6M ≥ 7LargerUSGS
M 6.9 · 197 km WNW of Port-Olry, Vanuatu
2026-10-24 02:31:28 UTC · depth 10 km · zone of 43 km
20 44 % 7 % — < 1 %
M 7.0 · Bonin Islands, Japan region
2026-10-24 02:09:00 UTC · depth 473 km · zone of 49 km
1 15 % 1 % — < 1 %
M 7.0 · 191 km ENE of Nagqu, China
2026-10-22 14:33:40 UTC · depth 18 km · zone of 49 km
5 41 % 6 % — < 1 %
M 6.9 · 76 km NE of Ozernovskiy, Russia
2026-10-16 03:35:31 UTC · depth 135 km · zone of 43 km
0 4 % < 1 % — < 1 %
M 6.8 · central Mid-Atlantic Ridge
2026-10-13 12:23:07 UTC · depth 10 km · zone of 37 km
0 18 % 2 % — < 1 %
M 6.7 · central Mid-Atlantic Ridge
2026-10-13 05:44:46 UTC · depth 10 km · zone of 33 km
0 15 % 1 % — < 1 %
M 7.7 · 12 km WSW of Pitaloza Arriba, Panama
2026-10-09 17:56:06 UTC · depth 13 km · zone of 127 km
19 45 % 7 % < 1 % < 1 %
M 6.7 · 74 km ENE of Tadine, New Caledonia
2026-09-25 21:23:03 UTC · depth 10 km · zone of 33 km
18 8 % < 1 % — < 1 %

Verification of the issued forecasts

The first forecast issued for each window is kept untouched, then compared with what actually happened once the window has closed: electrons measured by GOES, the Kp index, the USGS catalogue. The score builds up day after day.

The first windows have not closed yet: the score will appear in a few days.

Methods and reliability

Radiation-belt electrons

Frequency, from 1994 to 2020, of alert days two days after a day with the same solar wind speed (4 classes) and the same electron level (below or above the threshold). The link and the two-day delay are established by the correspondence “Solar wind and radiation-belt electrons” (Reeves et al., 2011). Today’s measurements come from the real-time solar wind (DSCOVR or ACE) and GOES-16 or later, whose instrument differs from the archive’s (GOES-8 to 15): a calibration difference of a factor 2–3 is possible near the threshold.

Geomagnetic storm

Frequency, on the GFZ Kp index since 1932, of a storm (Kp ≥ 5) within the next three days, given three indicators known on the day: a storm one solar rotation earlier (coronal holes and their fast wind come back every 27 days), a storm in the last 24 hours (persistence) and the sunspot number of the last 28 days (under 50, 50 to 120, over 120). The 12 cells of the table are counted over the whole record; the score is measured with frequencies from 1932–1989 evaluated on 1990–2026. Coronal mass ejections, unpredictable more than three days ahead without images of the Sun, limit the gain: NOAA, which sees the Sun, does better one or two days ahead.

Reliability on 1990–2026: forecast probability and observed frequency
ForecastObservedn
19 %10 %4,406
27 %21 %2,850
35 %30 %3,528
49 %39 %1,659
68 %64 %987

Global temperature of the coming months

The attribution regression of global temperature (El Niño three months earlier, volcanic aerosols, the Sun and the CO₂ forcing, after Foster and Rahmstorf, 2011), fitted on 1959–2012 and extended to the coming months: the three-month delay of El Niño makes the next three months predictable from values already measured. CO₂ is extended along its last 24 months, the Sun kept at its last value. The forecast relaxes towards the mean residual of the last 36 months (the regression underestimates the warming since 2013) and keeps part of the last month’s departure (persistence φh). Hindcasts made every month since October 2012, with only the data available at their date, give the errors, the gain over persistence and the record probabilities.

Aftershocks of recent large earthquakes

Model of Reasenberg and Jones (1989): the aftershock rate decays as the Omori law, (t + c)−p, grows with the mainshock magnitude and follows the Gutenberg–Richter law. Its parameters are fitted on the global USGS catalogue since 1973 (as Page et al., 2016), with a separate productivity for deep earthquakes (70 km or more), seven times less productive, and a negative binomial law, because sequences are far more variable than a Poisson process. The zone is a circle whose radius is the rupture length of Wells and Coppersmith (1994). The generic California model overestimated global aftershocks by a factor of 2 to 5: hence the refit.

Reliability on 2010–2026, M ≥ 5 aftershock between 1 and 8 days
ForecastObservedn
9 %3 %38
14 %5 %104
26 %7 %27
37 %31 %291
52 %60 %146
68 %82 %88
86 %91 %11

Aurora visible from a few cities

The NOAA OVATION Prime model (Newell et al., 2014) estimates every few minutes, from the solar wind measured at L1, the probability of visible aurora on a 1° grid, valid 30 to 90 minutes later. For each city: the value of the nearest cell (aurora overhead) and the highest value within 600 km (an aurora whose lower edge is at 110 km altitude is then at least 8° above the horizon). The elevation of the Sun, from approximate formulas (± 1°), tells whether it is dark enough (Sun below −12°). It is a NOAA model: the Observatory neither scores nor logs it.

Method and sources

Each forecast is a conditional frequency or a model fitted on the public data of this site, then evaluated on a period it never saw: the “gain over climatology” is the Brier skill score, 1 − BS / BSclim, where climatology always forecasts the usual frequency. 0: no better than climatology; 1: perfect forecast. Risk levels follow a fixed probability scale, the same for every card. Every hour the command app:forecast:issue recomputes the forecasts; the first one issued for each window is logged, then compared with what happened once the window has closed.

Reading these data
A 30 % probability is neither a prediction nor a mistake if the event does not happen: out of a hundred forecasts at 30 %, about thirty should come true. The reliability tables check this on past data. The models are generic: they ignore what specialised services know about a specific event (images of the Sun, model of the fault).
SOURCES OF THIS PAGE
GISTEMP v4 global land-ocean temperature anomaly
GISTEMP Team (2026). GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP), version 4. NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies; Lenssen et al. (2024). · doi:10.1029/2023JD040179 · source page ↗
Licence : NASA data, public domain; cite GISTEMP Team and Lenssen et al. (2024) · retrieved on Oct 23, 2026 · SHA-256 4c64eda288bc…
Niño 3.4 SST anomaly (NOAA PSL, ERSSTv5)
NOAA PSL, Niño 3.4 index: monthly SST anomaly (5°N–5°S, 170°–120°W) from ERSSTv5, climatology 1991–2020. · source page ↗
Licence : U.S. Government work, public domain · retrieved on Oct 23, 2026 · SHA-256 879cf3cb31d7…
Mauna Loa monthly mean CO₂ (NOAA GML)
Lan, X., Tans, P., & Thoning, K. W. (2026). Trends in globally-averaged CO₂ determined from NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory measurements; Mauna Loa monthly mean, after Thoning et al. (1989). · doi:10.1029/JD094iD06p08549 · source page ↗
Licence : U.S. Government work, public domain; cite Lan, X., Tans, P. & Thoning, K. W., NOAA GML · retrieved on Oct 23, 2026 · SHA-256 d895fb5b4a59…
NOAA SWPC real-time solar wind (RTSW, 1-minute plasma and magnetic field)
NOAA SWPC Real-Time Solar Wind (DSCOVR / SOLAR-1 / ACE at L1), 1-minute values. · source page ↗
Licence : U.S. Government work, public domain · retrieved on Oct 25, 2026 · SHA-256 66c60607561e…
GOES primary integral electron flux ≥ 2 MeV (NOAA SWPC)
NOAA SWPC, GOES primary satellite SEISS MPS-HI integral electron flux ≥ 2 MeV, 5-minute values. · source page ↗
Licence : U.S. Government work, public domain · retrieved on Oct 25, 2026 · SHA-256 54e8a1b04a3b…
Daily Particle Data archive, GOES proton and electron fluences 1994–2020 (NOAA SWPC)
NOAA SWPC, Daily Particle Data (DPD), GOES-7 to GOES-15 integral particle fluences, old_indices archive. · source page ↗
Licence : U.S. Government work, public domain; credit NOAA SWPC · retrieved on Oct 25, 2026 · SHA-256 7d8ba231a162…
OMNI2 hourly near-Earth solar wind and geomagnetic indices
King, J. H., & Papitashvili, N. E. (2005). Solar wind spatial scales in and comparisons of hourly Wind and ACE plasma and magnetic field data. J. Geophys. Res., 110, A02104. OMNI2 data from NASA/GSFC SPDF OMNIWeb; Kp/ap from GFZ Potsdam, Dst from WDC Kyoto, F10.7 from NRC Canada (Penticton). · doi:10.1029/2004JA010649 · source page ↗
Licence : NASA data, public domain; acknowledge SPDF/OMNIWeb and the index providers · retrieved on Oct 23, 2026 · SHA-256 6de9b217bd4b…
Geomagnetic Kp and ap indices (GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences)
Matzka, J., Stolle, C., Yamazaki, Y., Bronkalla, O. and Morschhauser, A. (2021). The geomagnetic Kp index and derived indices of geomagnetic activity. Space Weather, 19, e2020SW002641. Data: Matzka, J., Bronkalla, O., Tornow, K., Elger, K. and Stolle, C. (2021). Geomagnetic Kp index. V. 1.0. GFZ Data Services. · doi:10.5880/Kp.0001 · source page ↗
Licence : CC BY 4.0; cite Matzka et al. (2021) · retrieved on Oct 25, 2026 · SHA-256 2961750edc66…
NOAA SWPC estimated planetary K index (3-hourly)
NOAA SWPC, Planetary K-index (estimated, 3-hourly, from a network of ground magnetometers). · source page ↗
Licence : U.S. Government work, public domain · retrieved on Oct 25, 2026 · SHA-256 244c44f8a306…
SILSO daily total sunspot number V2.0
SILSO World Data Center. The International Sunspot Number, V2.0. Royal Observatory of Belgium, Brussels. · source page ↗
Licence : CC BY-NC 4.0 · retrieved on Oct 23, 2026 · SHA-256 4c452439dc1f…
USGS ComCat earthquakes M ≥ 4.5 (FDSN event service)
U.S. Geological Survey, Earthquake Hazards Program (2017). Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS) Comprehensive Catalog of Earthquake Events and Products. Accessed through the FDSN event web service. · doi:10.5066/F7MS3QZH · source page ↗
Licence : U.S. Government work, public domain; cite USGS ANSS ComCat · retrieved on Oct 25, 2026 · SHA-256 c9efda8729d3…
Reasenberg et al. (1989)
Reasenberg, P. A., & Jones, L. M. (1989). Earthquake hazard after a mainshock in California. Science, 243(4895), 1173–1176. · doi:10.1126/science.243.4895.1173
Licence : Published literature; cited
Page et al. (2016)
Page, M. T., van der Elst, N., Hardebeck, J., Felzer, K., & Michael, A. J. (2016). Three ingredients for improved global aftershock forecasts: tectonic region, time-dependent catalog incompleteness, and intersequence variability. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 106(5), 2290–2301. · doi:10.1785/0120160073
Licence : Published literature; cited
Wells et al. (1994)
Wells, D. L., & Coppersmith, K. J. (1994). New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84(4), 974–1002. · doi:10.1785/BSSA0840040974
Licence : Published literature; cited
Foster et al. (2011)
Foster, G., & Rahmstorf, S. (2011). Global temperature evolution 1979–2010. Environmental Research Letters, 6, 044022. · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/044022
Licence : Published literature; cited
Newell et al. (2014)
Newell, P. T., Liou, K., Zhang, Y., Sotirelis, T., Paxton, L. J., & Mitchell, E. J. (2014). OVATION Prime-2013: extension of auroral precipitation model to higher disturbance levels. Space Weather, 12(6), 368–379. · doi:10.1002/2014SW001056
Licence : Published literature; cited
Reeves et al. (2011)
Reeves, G. D., Morley, S. K., Friedel, R. H. W., Henderson, M. G., Cayton, T. E., et al. (2011). On the relationship between relativistic electron flux and solar wind velocity: Paulikas and Blake revisited. Journal of Geophysical Research, 116, A02213. · doi:10.1029/2010JA015735
Licence : Published literature; cited